Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Defined benefit plan provides for a life annuity with 10 years certain which is selected by the retiree. Retiree dies after 8 years. Remaining amount (2 years worth of payments) is paid in a lump sum to nonspouse beneficiary (as permitted by the plan). Is such amount rolloverable and is 20 percent withholding required on the distribution?

Posted

OK, perhaps I'm having trouble with plain English today. Where in that reg do you get the "no"?

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

Last sentence of subparagraph ©

"For example, subtantially equal periodic payments made unde a life annuity with a five-year term certain would not be an eligible rollover distribuiton even when paid after the death of the employee with three years remaining under the term certain."

Posted

Yeah, but............

according to your original post, the plan paid a lump sum equivalent, not "substantially equal periodic payments".

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

I am not sure if that makes a difference.

subparagraph (a)

Generally, whether a series of payments is a series of substantially equal periodic payments over a specified period is determined at the time payments begin ... without regard to contingencies or modifications that have not yet occurred.

And then there is the statement is subparagraph ©

However, a new determination is not made merely becuse, upon the death of the employees, the spouse or foremer spouse of the employee becomes the distributee.

Posted

The referenced Q&A is focused on whether the remaining substantially equal payments get a different treatment. But there are no such payments, because the new payment form is an entirely different situation.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use