khn Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 We have a situation where a client's recordkeeper is offering to backdate a fee reduction for them as of march 1st; however, in that case they obviously wouldn't be able to get a fee disclosure out to participants 30 days prior. I'm thinking that because it's a reduction in fees that will benefit participants, they can send just send the disclosure asap without getting in trouble. Any thoughts?
MWeddell Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 First reaction is don't do business with any recordkeeper who is offering to backdate a document to solve a compliance glitch. K2retire, david rigby and MoJo 3
Lou S. Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 Assuming the prior fee notices were good, I don't see a problem with a supplemental notices to the effect of - we have negotiated a fee reduction as follows with our current provider retroactive to March 1, 2014.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now