Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Company A Company B

Owner A 99 % Owner A 69%

Owner B 1% Owner B 1%

Owner C 30%

Owner A and C are cousins. Owner A does not receive income or from Company B and Owner C does not receive income from Company A.

I believe it's controlled based on 50% identical ownership correct?

Posted

If you subscribe to TAG they have sweet template that will analyze up to 5 entities (maybe 4?) for 4 owners. Just put in your data and there are these really cool formulas that say "Company 1 and Company 2 are a controlled group" or Company 3 and 4 are a controlled group and Companies 1 and 5 are a controlled group.

I'd share it but I would feel bad publishing their intellectual capital.

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Posted

CG for accounting yes, CG for pensions no, ASG undetermined

I agree that it is not a CG for pensions. I don't know what is the difference between pension and accounting. Can you explain why it is a CG for accounting?

Posted

If you look at the code, it was modified several years ago from 80% to 50%. Then the pension only 80% was added back in a later sub-section.

Posted

Original post indicates that A and C are cousins. What difference would that make? Cousins don't count for family aggregation, do they?

Always check with your actuary first!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use