Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If I want to write the plan document so that it gives the Owner's the maximum lump sum under 415, do I need to include how that is calculated.

Basically, we want the owner's to get the max each year without having to amend each year.

Is there a better way to write it so they owner's get the maximum allocation?

Thanks for your input.

Posted

You are working way to hard, and just asking for trouble.

Pick a safe amount close to the 415 limit and use the maximum funding limit to keep the plan overfunded. Then, in the 9th year, or when he starts wanting to terminate, calculate the maximum benefit and make sure the assets don't exceed that amount.

This works great, especially if you don't have any other participants.

IMHO, the 415 limit is too fluid to try to match every year.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

This also depends on the anticipated cash flow. Don't assume it will be level every year.

If sponsor thinks corporate cash flow in year 9 or 10 (for example) might be much lower (or higher) than in year 3, then plan for it, especially as Effen has suggested. Ok, this might sound simple or intuitive, but it's overlooked. Just ask the question.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

We've seen a few takover plans where the prior provider put in a cash balance credit equal to the present value of about 10% the 415 dollar limit using 5.5% interest but not to exceed the difference between the partipant's actual cash balance account and the present value of their full 415 limit at 5.5%. They even did something like that for the credit for the NHCEs based on the 0.50% of pay. Lots of PV calculations for no real gain. hArd for any participant to project their own potential benefits. I recommend using the approach described by Effen. Use your funding cushions to allow the higher deductions, then amend as needed near the end to handle any excess as 401(a)(4) testing would allow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...