Briandfox Posted December 12, 2014 Posted December 12, 2014 Plan that offers a basic safe harbor match to all NHCE's wants to expand eligibility to allow a definitely determinable class of HCE's to participate (midyear). I know midyear amendments to safe harbor plans are frowned upon, however, the same employees would be eligible both pre and post the amendment. This employer just wants to provide additional benefits to a subset of it's HCEs (same as the basic match). Can this be done? If not via a safe harbor contribution is there any alternative that can be done this year? Thanks
Tom Poje Posted December 12, 2014 Posted December 12, 2014 at the 2012 ASPPA Conference (Q and A #37) the IRS expressed the following opinion.(That doesn't necessarily mean it represents an actual Treasury position, but at least it gives something to point to if the issue gets raised as to why you did what you did)Q.A safe harbor 401(k) plan covers only salaried employeesof Company X. The plan passes the ratio test under IRC§410(b). The plan year ends December 31. In June, Xdecides it would like to open up the 401(k) plan to thehourly paid employees, effective on July 1. Would thisamendment be a violation of IRC §401(k)(12)? ASPPA suggested answer: No. Although certain amendments to a safe harbor401(k) plan are not permitted to be made effective ona date other than the first day of the plan year, this isnot one of those types of amendments. Theamendment solely applies to employees who are nototherwise covered by the plan. The safe harbor rulessimply treats these individuals as newly eligible, andthe safe harbor notice provided prior to the beginningof the plan year would not have had to be distributedto these employees before July 1. IRS Response The IRS agrees with the proposed answer as long as there is noeffect on the already-eligible employees.
Briandfox Posted December 12, 2014 Author Posted December 12, 2014 Thanks, this is helpful. Is the alternative a VCP submission?
Tom Poje Posted December 12, 2014 Posted December 12, 2014 I guess I am a bit confused at the moment. if these people haven't deferred there is nothing to fix under VCP. what type of plan year are you talking about? if it's calendar year I would just amend for the upcoming year. a bit late to do much for 2014.
Briandfox Posted December 12, 2014 Author Posted December 12, 2014 Unforunately, in operations the HCEs have been allowed to defer in spite of the fact that the plan document excludes them. Since this all happened in 2014 my thought was to retroactively amend the eligibility provisions of the safe harbor plan before the last day of the 2014 plan year so that everyone could keep their intended safe harbor contribution. I know some amendments can be adopted by the end of the plan year and be retroactively effective to the beginning of the year to conform the plan to operations. My gut tells me that this is not such an amendment because it relates to eligibility under safe harbor. The alternative is to do essentially the same thing anyway but submit under VCP.
BW Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 Given the very limited SCP options for retroactive amendment I'd go VCP.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now