LMOC Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 Summary - A plan has a payroll by payroll fixed match. They may want to amend the plan retroactively to allow for a match true up. Does IRS Regulations allow for a match true up essentially at year end retroactively to 1/1?
Lou S. Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 As long as it is not a safe harbor plan (because it would change the info in the notice) you should not have any problems with such an amendment as you won't be cutting anyone's benefit. I think the IRS views this as a discretionary amendment that needs to be adopted before the end of the year.
LMOC Posted December 22, 2014 Author Posted December 22, 2014 Thank you Lou! It's not Safe Harbor, but it does have a Fixed Match. Does that change your thought?
Lou S. Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 No. You are increasing the match for some or all but none will have match cut.
QDROphile Posted December 23, 2014 Posted December 23, 2014 Any concern that the amendment itself (which subject to 401(a)(4)) could be discriminatory because it benefits only the HCEs? That gets us back to the old questions about neutral terms of an amendment the effectively benefits only HCEs when adopted but could be nondiscriminatory over time.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now