pmacduff Posted February 12, 2015 Posted February 12, 2015 I know I have seen this question before & probably even asked it myself! Background: plain 401(k) profit sharing plan the over age 50 owner made $22,669.18 in 401(k) contributions the ADP test passes. there is no match in the plan computing the profit share contribution to maximize the owner using a cross tested formula. The 2014 individual limit is $52,000. with $5,500 401(k) catch up, $57,500. Since this owner only made $5,169.18 in catch up contributions is his total allocation amount limited to $57,169.18 or can he still get to $57,500? I know it's not much in this instance but I want to do it right and get the client as much as possible. thanks in advance!
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted February 12, 2015 Posted February 12, 2015 As long as the participant made an elective deferral equal to at least the catch-up ($5,500 for 2014), then yes, they can be provided the entire $57,500. Meaning, it is not just the 402(g) limit or ADP test failure that creates a "catch-up" deferral. If the plan limited regular deferrals for HCEs to 5% of compensation, they could still defer 5% of pay plus $5,500 (but they can't defer more than their wages, of course). In your case, deferrals get classified as catch-ups due to the 415 limitation. If the combined ER and EE allocations are enough to push the total allocation over the $52,000 limit for 2014, then deferrrals are classified as "catch-up" deferrals as needed up to the $5,500 limit. Of course, as you noted, all other testing still has to pass: 410(b), 401(a)(4), etc. I have not yet seen a document that would not allow this, but double check your plan language just in case. For example, it should say something like this: Catch-Up Deferral. A catch-up deferral is an elective deferral by a catch-up eligible participant and which is greater than: (1) a plan limit on elective deferrals; (2) the annual additions limit under section 415(d); (3) the elective deferral limit under section 402(g) or (4) the ADP limit under plan section X.X. Lou S. 1
Lou S. Posted February 12, 2015 Posted February 12, 2015 We even had an IRS audit of small plan a few years back where the IRS said the owners were over 415 limit because they got PS of 415© limit plus 401(k) equal to catchup. After politely explaining the IRS regs on catch-ups to the IRS auditor they agreed it was OK and no 415 violation. Hopefully the auditors have a better handle on that particular issue these days if it comes up again.
pmacduff Posted February 13, 2015 Author Posted February 13, 2015 Thank you John and Lou! I was pretty sure that was the case but as time goes on and esp. this time of year my brain can muddle thoughts. (as a side note the Plan is on a Corbel VS document)
Kevin C Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 It also wouldn't hurt to check the deduction limit. It's usually high enough that it doesn't affect things, but every once in a while, it applies before you reach 415.
Lou S. Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 Thank you John and Lou! I was pretty sure that was the case but as time goes on and esp. this time of year my brain can muddle thoughts. (as a side note the Plan is on a Corbel VS document) Not a problem, we also use the Corbel Doc and it is OK in both prototype and VS.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now