Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Let's say the plan is cross-tested and the owners want to max out and give themselves the profit sharing contribution that will bring them to the 415 limit. The plan gives a 3% Safe Harbor non-elective contribution as well.

However, there is an allocation condition (have to be employed on last day of the plan year to receive an allocation) on the regular profit sharing contribution. A few people were terminated during the year and while they receive the Safe Harbor non-elective, they are not entitled to the regular profit sharing because they didn't meet the allocation condition. Because they don't receive the regular profit sharing contribution, the plan fails to allocate the minimum gateway.

My question is this: can the document be retroactively amended in 2015 in order to remove the allocation condition and allow all the employees to receive the regular profit sharing contribution?

Posted

First you might want to check to see if your Plan Document has fail safe gateway language just for this situation, I know our old prototype and current volume submitter both have such language.

If the Plan does, then you just allocate the gateway and assuming you pass all the other test than you are done, no need for amendment.

If the Plan doesn't have such language then yes this sounds like a classic 11(g) amendment situation to correct the failure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use