Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What are people's thoughts about starting a new 401(k) plan (or adding a CODA to a PS only plan) , when the deferral effective date occurs late in the year, after October 1.

Clearly it is permissible until October 1(for a calendar year plan), as evidenced by the 3 month rule written into the SH regulations.

What about for non-safe harbor plans? Effective availability for benefits, rights, and features?

I'm not concerned about an employer that is 100% highly compensated, nor am I concern about an employer with zero highly compensated. I'm concerned about a classic small employer with a mix of highly and non-highly compensated employees who would be eligible to participate in the plan.

I have my thoughts on the subject, but I'm curious to hear others' thoughts.

Posted

We've set up plans late in the year and had the owner(s) defer 5% using the deemed 3% for NHCEs rule, and kicked in with a safe harbor the next year. Never gave it much thought as not being ok.

Ed Snyder

Posted

What issues are you thinking of specifically? As far as availability, it'd be open to 100% of the eligible NHCE and 100% of the eligible HCE.

I can't think of an issue that non-discrimination tests wouldn't suss out, but it's the first time I've thought about this.

R. Alexander

Posted

If you set it up to begin on December 31, and only the owner will have compensation (year-end bonus) paid that day from which a deferral can be made, then I think you have a problem for that plan year ending December 31. Assuming you have some NHCEs that would have been eligible to defer if they had also received wages on December 31.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use