cpc0506 Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Client has come to us and would like to start a new plan for their employees covered under the Service Contract Act. Currently the client sponsors a QACA match plan, no other employer contributions. There were 65 eligible employees in 2014. Client wants to start a new plan effective 1/1/2016 for the 8-10 employees covered under the Service Contract Act, but do not want to provide the QACA match to these employees. Can a company sponsor a safe harbor plan for one portion of its employees and a non-safe harbor plan for another portion of its employees? If it is permitted, what would be the pros/cons to doing this?
Bill Presson Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Yes. The QACA plan has to be amended to exclude the SCA employees. The SCA plan would exclude everyone except the SCA employees. William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA bill.presson@gmail.com C 205.994.4070
cpc0506 Posted December 7, 2015 Author Posted December 7, 2015 So the client will have 2 plans. Is it correction that the plans will have to pass coverage separately since I cannot permissively aggregate two unlike plans?
rcline46 Posted December 7, 2015 Posted December 7, 2015 Why the concern? the PW contributions are NOT deferrals and are of no consequence. Why not let them into the QACA plan?
cpc0506 Posted December 7, 2015 Author Posted December 7, 2015 They want to allow them to make deferral contributions but NOT received a QACA match, so a separate plan will need to be established.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now