BG5150 Posted April 15, 2016 Posted April 15, 2016 Does anyone do their general testing using the accrued-to-date method? We have a client whose prior TPA did their calculations that way and I can't make heads or tails of it. I understand the general premise, but Relius cannot do the calculation so it would have to all be done by hand. (Or, rather, spreadsheet) Questions: for average compensation: are you taking the average compensation over the measuring period? Last 3? High 3? Does the measuring period have a minimum length? 2, 3 years maybe? Is this a popular method to use? This is the first time I've come acrosst this since reading about it for an ASPPA test like 10 years ago. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Tom Poje Posted April 15, 2016 Posted April 15, 2016 well, the following might help the first 2 pages from an ASPPA talk by Richard Bednarski (1998) gives a basic explanation and the last 2 pages a worksheet (and a sample) by Larry Deutch which is at least as old and the brain gears in my head squeaking along just enough to remember I even had these notes because the info poured out of the head too many years ago when I rolled over in my sleep. sorry, should have worn ear plugs. poje useless and secret files.pdf K2retire 1
K2retire Posted April 15, 2016 Posted April 15, 2016 well, the following might help the first 2 pages from an ASPPA talk by Richard Bednarski (1998) gives a basic explanation and the last 2 pages a worksheet (and a sample) by Larry Deutch which is at least as old and the brain gears in my head squeaking along just enough to remember I even had these notes because the info poured out of the head too many years ago when I rolled over in my sleep. sorry, should have worn ear plugs. As someone who regularly sleeps with ear plugs, I can attest that they do not help with brain leakage!
Dougsbpc Posted April 17, 2016 Posted April 17, 2016 Often, accrued-to-date works very well with a plan that has operated as comp-to-comp contribution allocation for years and then switches to a cross-tested plan. We had an accounting firm client that had 3 partners who were getting older and wanted to sock away as much as possible before retirement. They kept the same 8% annual contribution to everyone but the partners were able to have the maximum for a number of years. This was partially due to the fact that they had a comp-to-comp plan for many years along with using accrued to date.
AndyH Posted April 18, 2016 Posted April 18, 2016 Tom, you're either a packrat or you invented the scanner in 1988. I think I used a 4K computer in 1988.
Tom Poje Posted April 18, 2016 Posted April 18, 2016 Andy - it was 1998 when I obtained the notes not 1988, and only saved because it pertained to cross testing, though I have never used it. but enough useful info in those notes (at least I think) to get one started
AndyH Posted April 18, 2016 Posted April 18, 2016 oh, I could read better in 1998 or 1988. It is a good outline though.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now