Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Defined benefit plan is offering a temporary lump sum window to VT participants. The sponsor's DC plan accepts a direct rollover for an active employee.

1. Can the DC plan be amended to permit a direct rollover from a VT participant, when the DC account for this person is currently zero?

2. Same as (1), but assume the DC account is currently non-zero?

(Of course, proposed action is non-discriminatory and would apply to any such VT, without regard to HCE or NHCE.)

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

The plan can accept eligible rollover distributions under its own terms. Generally it is not a good idea to allow rollovers for anyone but "active" participants and I do not think it is discrimination to deny rollovers into the plan for "inactive" participants. Your circumstances are worthy of exception and I think the DC account balance should be irrelevant, but a distinction should not be discriminatory or otherwise impermissible.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use