Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

One of my plans currently requires 1,000 hours of service in a plan year (calendar) to receive a year of vesting credit. Client is considering changing to elapsed time. The current six-year schedule will remain. Do I have this right, regarding a mid-year change?

  • Credit that was already granted for years prior to 2016 will remain unchanged -- based on counting hours, not elapsed time.
  • Anyone who has any hours of service at the time of the change this year will receive a year of vesting credit if they complete 1,000 hour in 2016 -- regardless of whether they reach that number of hours before or after the change.
  • Anyone who reaches his 2016 anniversary date after the change will receive a year of vesting credit.
  • Potentially, then, a participant could receive two years of vesting credit during 2016: One for completing 1,000 during the year, and another for reaching his anniversary date by the end of the year -- assuming the anniversary date is later in the year than the effective date of the change.

Or do I have this all wrong?

Thanks for your help!

Posted

Your approach would probably be necessary if you were changing the measurement year. If you are only changing the way to determine how much vesting service was earned in a given measurement year, it would probably not be necessary to double count time.

Always check with your actuary first!

Posted

I've never seen a mix and match approach. It is usually a greater of the two approach.

Posted

I went through this last year, and can I just say that the EOB has a pretty good summary of what you need to do. I won't paraphrase it here but it's under the heading "Changing the plan's service crediting method" if you have that resource and want to search for it.

Posted

ERISA Outline Book.
Author is Sal Tripodi.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use