Belgarath Posted August 17, 2016 Posted August 17, 2016 I probably don't even have enough information to properly ask this question, but I thought I'd give it a shot. I don't know whether this relates specifically to a section 125 Cafeteria plan, or some other form of welfare benefit plan. I THINK the question revolved around whether the 1-person employer could be considered as having a "group" health insurance plan, in order to be eligible for some sort of welfare plan with dependent care benefits, etc... Does anyone know, offhand, what the governing authority is for defining a "group" plan for such purposes? Or any other pertinent items? Thanks.
Peter Gulia Posted August 17, 2016 Posted August 17, 2016 Which definition of group health plan applies or is relevant turns on which law, rule, or insurance regime one seeks to apply or non-apply. Not all definitions are the same. Also, regarding a "micro" business, some of the definitions can be confusing or ambiguous concerning who counts (or doesn't) as an employee. Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
Belgarath Posted August 18, 2016 Author Posted August 18, 2016 Ok - I asked the individual, and here's the actual question:"Section 125/Cafeteria Plan and Health Reimbursement Arrangement eligibility is tied to eligibility for group health insurance; what constitutes group health insurance? Could a C Corporation owner and spouse’s coverage be considered “group” insurance or would that same owner/employee need one or more people (non-family member) to be considered group insurance?" Thanks.
Peter Gulia Posted August 18, 2016 Posted August 18, 2016 Would the spouse be covered because he or she is an employee's spouse? Or would the spouse be covered because he or she is an employee? Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
Belgarath Posted August 18, 2016 Author Posted August 18, 2016 I'm assuming the former. But it could be either... - however, I think if the latter, then it could indeed be considered a "group" - so I guess my question really is about if there is only 1 employee.
Peter Gulia Posted August 19, 2016 Posted August 19, 2016 If the only worker is the one shareholder, it seems unlikely that there is a group. But is having a group a condition for the health-insurance income tax treatment your client seeks? Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
Belgarath Posted August 19, 2016 Author Posted August 19, 2016 Thanks. Apparently (and I'm getting this second-hand) the cafeteria plan specifies that eligibility is such that the employee must be eligible for the employer's group health insurance - or something like that. I don't know if this is a regulatory/legal requirement, or a document eligibility provision (or both). So the question is apparently whether a 1-employee plan can be considered "group" health insurance. Does this perhaps vary by State?
lvena Posted August 19, 2016 Posted August 19, 2016 You should investigate a Section 105 option, I do not keep up with this anymore, but it might be a better fit. Suggest you use an administrator that does this, such as Core or some other.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now