thepensionmaven Posted October 18, 2016 Posted October 18, 2016 Company A is wholly owned and owns 70% of Company B. Company A has a safe harbor 401(k) We administer the plan of Company A Company B participates in a MEP sponsored by a payroll company, also a safe harbor 401(k). Effective 11/1, Company A is severing their relationship with the payroll provider and wants out of the MEP. If we add a joinder agreement to the existing plan of Company A, can we include the participants of Company B into the plan of Company A? As of 11/1 or must this be done on a calendar year basis? What are the mechanics to get this done??
ETA Consulting LLC Posted October 18, 2016 Posted October 18, 2016 I want to get more understanding on your question:If Company B were to spin out of the MEP into a plan of it's own (and maintaining the exact same provisions as the MEP), then you'd effectively have the same setup as you currently have (with the only thing is being a absence of the MEP of which Company B is a part).Instead of placing B in an entirely separate plan, you want to simultaneously create a MEP by having Company B join Company A's plan as a Co-Sponsoring employer that is not a related employer.Is this about right? CPC, QPA, QKA, TGPC, ERPA
thepensionmaven Posted October 19, 2016 Author Posted October 19, 2016 Company B wants in with the company A plan, which is a Volume Submitter with Datair sponsor. I do not see why not, as long as I prepare a Joinder Agreement, effective 11/1/2016 adding Company B as a participating employer. BUT, Company B is coming off the MEP November 1st and wants to Join Company As plan immediately. Again, I do not see why they can not, as long as we amend the plan effective 11/1 to allow them to come in immediately. I have not handled the MEP concept before this joint. Thanks.
ETA Consulting LLC Posted October 19, 2016 Posted October 19, 2016 I agree with you. I'm looking at it as a business as usual. It is virtually the same process for any company looking to leave one MEP to join another. There really isn't a change in plan provisions and ultimately a change in the platform.The only caveat is that the new plan with A & B will become a MEP, effective 11/1; but that doesn't change anything operationally.I cannot fathom an issue with this.Good Luck! CPC, QPA, QKA, TGPC, ERPA
Below Ground Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 I am involved with this sort of event rather frequently. Make sure your paperwork is in order, provide proper notices (balckout, etc..), and don't rush things; and it all works out fine. Having braved the blizzard, I take a moment to contemplate the meaning of life. Should I really be riding in such cold? Why are my goggles covered with a thin layer of ice? Will this effect coverage testing? QPA, QKA
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now