Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A Tribal Governmental K-12 Public School wishes to establish a 401(k) plan.  I don't believe they can.

PPA 2006 expanded the definition of governmental plans to include a plan established or maintained by an Indian Tribal government for its employee’s performing “governmental functions”, but not to include those employees performing commercial activities (e.g., workers in a hotel, casino, or convenience store)  Essential governmental functions would be considered those functions customarily performed by state and local governments if: (1) There are numerous State and local governments with general taxing powers that have been conducting the activity and financing it with tax-exempt governmental bonds, (2) State and local governments with general taxing powers have been conducting the activity and financing it with tax-exempt governmental bonds for many years, and (3) the activity is not a commercial or industrial activity. 

Tribal governments can establish a money purchase plan or profit sharing plan for its “commercial” employees, not a 401(k), enabling it to comply with the applicable qualification rules under Code Section 401(a) for plans applicable to nongovernmental plans. 

An Indian Tribal Government is considered a “State” for 403(b) purposes, per Code Section 7871(a)(6)B), that they can offer a 403(b) program but only to employees of their educational institutions.

Is my assessment correct?

Posted

A tribal government can't have a 401(k) for employees providing government services (such as K-12 school employees, police and fire employees, courthouse employees, etc.), but it can have a 403(b) for some of those employees (e.g., the school employees).  It also can have a governmental profit sharing plan for these employees with a pre-tax pick-up by the tribe of mandatory employee contributions, which mimics a 401(k) plan to a great extent.  Those options apply to the tribe employees providing government services because the tribe is treated like a state government employer with respect to those employees.  It can have a 401(k) for its employees providing commercial services (such as casino workers) because it's treated like a private employer with respect to employees providing non-governmental/commercial services.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use