AndyH Posted January 30, 2019 Posted January 30, 2019 Have an antique integrated DB plan of .75% of average comp +.50% of average comp > $10,000, max 35 years. Sponsor wants to increase benefits by not more than 10% while keeping it simple and maintaining safe harbor status. Thinking about amending the plan to add to the existing formula effective 1/1/2019 2% of average comp x Years of service prior to 1/1/2019 limited to 5 years. This provision seems to violate the 133% rule. Or is it ok because it is due to an amendment and would be ok for every year of service starting 1/1/2019? If not ok, any other ideas (within the objective of a safe harbor formula)?
C. B. Zeller Posted January 30, 2019 Posted January 30, 2019 For purposes of the 133-1/3 rule, plan amendments are treated as if they were always in effect. In other words, the new formula is not tested against the old formula, but only against itself. See 411(b)(1)(b)(i) for reference. Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance. Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA Preferred Pension Planning Corp.corey@pppc.co
AndyH Posted January 30, 2019 Author Posted January 30, 2019 Thanks for the reply. The cite says any amendment to the plan which is in effect for the current year shall be treated as in effect for all other plan years; It is not obvious to me that this exempts the fact that the current year accrual is more than 133% of the prior year accrual. How do I get past that?
C. B. Zeller Posted January 31, 2019 Posted January 31, 2019 If I'm understanding you correctly, the new formula grants an additional 2% of average comp per year of service up to 5 years as long as those years were completed prior to 1/1/2019. Since the formula is treated as being in effect for all plan years, for this purpose the extra 2% per year would be treated as accruing in the employee's first 5 years prior to 2019 - not in the current year. Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance. Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA Preferred Pension Planning Corp.corey@pppc.co
AndyH Posted January 31, 2019 Author Posted January 31, 2019 Right. So I guess it is frontloading not backloading from that perspective. Thanks.
baneja Posted January 31, 2019 Posted January 31, 2019 I believe the accrued benefit as of 12/31/2018 must be preserved.
AndyH Posted February 1, 2019 Author Posted February 1, 2019 The accrued benefit is being increased for anyone with pre 2019 service.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now