Robin Wilson Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 When client severs their relationship with MEP provider and wants to set-up their own plan, should that plan be a "restate" of an existing plan for that employer or the establishment of a new plan? My understanding is that a spinoff from a MEP is a continuation of an existing plan. Is that correct?
Bird Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 We've done an occasional spin-off, say where two docs split up. I'm quite sure we have created a new plan and then spun-off the assets in a separate transaction. Yeah it is considered a continuation of/from the original plan in a way but I don't think, e.g., that you would use the original effective date of the old plan when setting up the new plan, nor do I think you would call it a restatement. I'm not sure if I am disagreeing... Luke Bailey 1 Ed Snyder
FORMER ESQ. Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 Look to the terms of the MEP master plan document. It will give you the procedure to follow. If the procedure is unclear, please write back. Robin Wilson 1
Robin Wilson Posted January 6, 2021 Author Posted January 6, 2021 When transferring assets due to a spinoff, protected benefits should be adhered to, as i understand the regs. Should the definition of compensation be considered? What about safe harbor provisions? Luke Bailey 1
Luke Bailey Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 8 hours ago, Bird said: We've done an occasional spin-off, say where two docs split up. I'm quite sure we have created a new plan and then spun-off the assets in a separate transaction. Yeah it is considered a continuation of/from the original plan in a way but I don't think, e.g., that you would use the original effective date of the old plan when setting up the new plan, nor do I think you would call it a restatement. I'm not sure if I am disagreeing... 5 hours ago, Robin Wilson said: When transferring assets due to a spinoff, protected benefits should be adhered to, as i understand the regs. Should the definition of compensation be considered? What about safe harbor provisions? Right. It's both. It is a new plan, but since you are merging a spinoff of the MEP into your new individual employer plan it is a continuation for purposes of counting service, vesting, no cut-back, etc. Catch22PGM and Robin Wilson 2 Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now