Guest MFuentes Posted August 7, 2000 Posted August 7, 2000 Let's say a plan sponsor of a profit sharing plan has elected a discretionary provision in her plan with a pro-rata on comp allocation formula. If she can afford it she makes a contribution but if she can't then she won't. I know Treas. Reg. §1.401-(a) isn't violated and the service doesn't have a problem (last I heard) with this election. Now let's say the plan is a 401(k) plan with a match. The match contribution requirement is discretionary as in the profit sharing plan. But the allocation formula is 10% of salary deferrals up to a discretionary percent of eligible compensation. Does this "double discretion" violate the "definite formula" provision of Treas. Reg. §1.401-1(a)(2)(ii)? If so, is there a correction available?
Guest ERISAweasel Posted August 21, 2000 Posted August 21, 2000 My understanding is that "double discretion" fails to meet the "definitely determinable" requirements and therefore would not be an acceptable formula in a qualified plan. To the extent the plan document provided for such non-definitely determinable formula, it would be a "form" defect as opposed to an "operational" defect. It would seem one option would be to go Walk-in CAP (initially on a "John Doe" basis) and propose a reformatory amendment that codifies actual practice and sufficiently ties down the allocation method such that it becomes definitely determinable (probably easiest to hard-code the cap on percentage of salary matched).
Guest Posted August 24, 2000 Posted August 24, 2000 somewhere in the back of my poor thick skull I recall you could actually do this- discretionary match and discretionary ps. but heck if I could cite you anything. at least at this time. hopefully someone else might remember
Richard Anderson Posted August 24, 2000 Posted August 24, 2000 If the formula in the document is 10% with a discretionary cap, I think that is acceptable. But, if the document has a discretionary percentage match of deferrals and also allows a discretionary cap as a percentage comp, then you don't have a definitely determinable formula. If you want to use a cap, then I think that either the cap % or the match % must be stated in the document.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.