cpc0506 Posted March 13, 2022 Posted March 13, 2022 We have a long standing client who sponsors a soloK plan. His wife just established her business and he would like add her company to his plan as a Participating Employer PE. This may or may not be a Control Group. This will need to be determined. Aside from that issue, is a plan still a soloK plan if there are PEs? Would your answer be the same if this is a GG, or if adding the PE makes this a MEP. Thanks for your guidance.
CuseFan Posted March 14, 2022 Posted March 14, 2022 A "soloK plan" is a product with the fancy marketing moniker - are you asking if this would still be considered an owner-only plan with those ERISA exemptions and subject to 5500-EZ filing requirements? If CG, I think yes but, if MEP I'm not so sure. If not CG (yet), easy enough to get there by having one of them involved in the other's business in some minor fashion. Luke Bailey 1 Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services kprell@bpas.com
cpc0506 Posted March 18, 2022 Author Posted March 18, 2022 would your response be the same if both entities or sole-props and not corporations?
Nate S Posted March 22, 2022 Posted March 22, 2022 On 3/18/2022 at 4:57 PM, cpc0506 said: would your response be the same if both entities or sole-props and not corporations? In the guise of a husband - wife arrangement, no. But from a practical standpoint its almost impossible for husband - wife sole-proprietorships to be unaffiliated.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now