Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For some reason, powers that be made this plan effective 12/1/21.

What limits am I prorating when doing the profit sharing?

And am I correct in remembering that self-employment income is "earned" on 12/31?  So in this case, the owner will be using his full $290,000 comp?  (unless the comp limit is 1/12 of course...)

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

when does the plan year end?

Assuming you have a 1 month plan year then 415(c) and 401(a)(17) are both prorated by 1/12th so 415(c) limit would be $4,833.33 and 401(a)(17) $24,166.67.

Posted

PYE 12/31.  Sorry, should have made that clear. And...

Yikes. (I pretty much knew that)

I don't know who set up the plan that way and why.

The only two times I ever use a short plan year are plan termination years and spin-offs.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

Adopt a new plan 002 retro to 1/1 under SECURE; fund that for 2021; and merge into the old one for 2022; file $0 5500 for plan 001 for 2021? Kind of a PITA but I think it would solve your proration issues.

Posted
On 3/30/2022 at 4:49 PM, Lou S. said:

when does the plan year end?

Assuming you have a 1 month plan year then 415(c) and 401(a)(17) are both prorated by 1/12th so 415(c) limit would be $4,833.33 and 401(a)(17) $24,166.67.

Is 415 pro-rated or subject to the restriction, if any, of the "Limitation Year" in the doc?

Posted

I was under the impression if you had a short plan year you had a short plan limitation year as well but maybe I'm mixing something up?

Posted
7 minutes ago, Lou S. said:

I was under the impression if you had a short plan year you had a short plan limitation year as well but maybe I'm mixing something up?

That depends upon the definition in the plan document.  You would only be limited if the limitation year is tied to the plan year.  Otherwise most docs use a 12 month or calendar year measurement. 

Posted

We retroactively amended the plan.  One thought was that the amendment is correcting the operational failure of depositing the PS based on full-year salary.

Also, before the plan was adopted, several illustrations went back and forth clearly showing the PS based on full year comp, therefore showing intent.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use