Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Say I have 5 companies that all adopted a plan: A, B, C, D, E, F

The CG's are:

A B & C are one CG

D & E are another

A B & D also

C & E too

F is not part of any CG or ASG, so I have a MEP.

Do I need to do 5 separate tests?

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

There have been some prior threads on this, including one I believe I started, and my recollection is there's not one perfectly clear answer. 

Some take the position that belonging to an overlapping group makes an employer part of one larger group, which in your example would continue to grow. Because A, B, and C are related, and C and E are related, then A, B, C, and E are all one employer. If that's true, because D and E are related, and A, B, C, and E are related, then A, B, C, D, and E are all one employer. I suppose F would be separate in any event if unrelated to every other entity. This is the approach taken in Who's the Employer

Others take the position, maybe more as a practical alternative, that you test each group separately, which would give you five tests. I have heard from several TPAs who test using this approach. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use