Santo Gold Posted November 30, 2023 Posted November 30, 2023 Under 20 hours/week is roughly equal to 1000 hours/year. Our 403(b) plan would by definition possibly exclude individuals who work 500-999 hours, which would fit the LTPT classification. Based on the guidance that was recently released, I would conclude that LTPT applies to any 403(b) employees who have been kept out of the plan but who have worked 500-999 hours each year since 2021. They would have to be provided with the opportunity to contribute to the plan. Would you agree? Thank you
Peter Gulia Posted November 30, 2023 Posted November 30, 2023 About part-time employees, which provisions might be implied by law, or might be needed for a plan to tax-qualify under Internal Revenue Code of 1986 § 403(b), relates to whether the plan is: a plan governed by part 2 of subtitle B of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, a church plan that has not elected to be ERISA-governed, a governmental plan, a payroll convenience with so little employer involvement that it is not a plan within ERISA § 3’s (rather than IRC § 403(b)’s) meaning. For an ERISA-governed plan, ERISA sections 202 and 203 command provisions partially similar to IRC § 401(k)(2)(D)’s provisions for a cash-or-deferred arrangement. Under Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, the Treasury’s notice of proposed rulemaking to interpret IRC § 401(k)(2) also is an interpretation about similar provisions in ERISA §§ 202-203. If an ERISA-governed plan’s administrator interprets the plan to include eligibility provisions implied by ERISA §§ 202-203 and looks to the Treasury’s interpretation as an aid to the administrator’s interpretation, a court might treat that as some evidence of the administrator’s good faith. For a nonplan, all employees are eligible because for an employer to decide which employees are eligible would establish an ERISA-governed plan (if it’s not church or governmental). For a plan that is not ERISA-governed, IRC § 403(b)(12) describes provisions for a plan to get § 403(b) Federal income tax treatment. Beyond Federal law: For a governmental plan, State law governs which provisions a plan must, may, or must not include. For a church plan, internal church law might govern which provisions a plan must, may, or must not include. As always, a plan’s administrator (or an employer) should get its lawyer’s advice. Santo Gold, if you tell us which of the four kinds of § 403(b) plan your client maintains, BenefitsLink neighbor might be able to give you more detailed help. Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
LauraH Posted November 30, 2023 Posted November 30, 2023 In addition to what Peter said, don't forget that: 1. The LTPT eligibility rules only apply to 403(b) plans that are covered by ERISA; and 2. For 403(b) plans, only eligibility computation periods that begin on or after 1/1/2023 are counted. The earliest a 403(b) plan would be impacted is 1/1/2025. Luke Bailey 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now