Jakyasar Posted April 8 Posted April 8 I own company a 100% and had a DB plan which terminated. I started a new company and now own only 50% and want to start a DB plan. Same line of business. Does my old DB offset my new DB?
C. B. Zeller Posted April 9 Posted April 9 At 50% ownership there is not a controlled group. It would depend on whether the new company is a "successor" within the meaning of 1.415(f)-1(c). Quote (2) Where plan is not maintained by successor. With respect to an employer of a participant, a former entity that antedates the employer is a predecessor employer with respect to the participant if, under the facts and circumstances, the employer constitutes a continuation of all or a portion of the trade or business of the former entity. This will occur, for example, where formation of the employer constitutes a mere formal or technical change in the employment relationship and continuity otherwise exists in the substance and administration of the business operations of the former entity and the employer. Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance. Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA Preferred Pension Planning Corp.corey@pppc.co
Effen Posted April 9 Posted April 9 Agree w/ CB, but just clarifying that for 415 purposes the controlled group rule is "more than 50%", so I agree that the ownership doesn't look like an issue. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Jakyasar Posted April 9 Author Posted April 9 Corey, it is the same line of biz and it is a successor biz. No issue on the CG, agreed.
C. B. Zeller Posted April 9 Posted April 9 If it's a successor employer then the DB plans are aggregated for purposes of applying the 415 limit. In other words the distribution from the prior plan will reduce the max you can accrue in the new plan. Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance. Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA Preferred Pension Planning Corp.corey@pppc.co
Jakyasar Posted April 9 Author Posted April 9 So the fact that there is no CG does not eliminate the combined 415 limit?
C. B. Zeller Posted April 10 Posted April 10 Correct. All plans maintained by the employer or by a predecessor employer are treated as a single plan for purposes of applying the 415 limit. 1.415(f)-1(a)(1) David D 1 Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance. Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA Preferred Pension Planning Corp.corey@pppc.co
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now