Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We have a plan with 2 participants (correction: employees) 100% Owner and another employee who is an HCE (but not a Key Employee).

 

The plan excludes the HCE by name and only the Owner contributes to the plan.

 

The Plan is Top Heavy.

 

The plan passes coverage testing, since there are no NHCEs.

 

Does the plan have to fund the Top Heavy Minimum 3% to the HCE who is excluded from the Plan?

 

Thanks!

Posted

You say he's a participant, but you also say he's excluded from the plan by name.  Why is he being deemed a participant?  Because if he's really NOT one, then the THM would not apply.

That's different from being eligible and just not accruing anything.

Posted

oh, upon seeing the correction that HCE 2 is specifically not a participant, then that makes it evident he wouldn't need to get a THM.

Posted

I thought exclusion by name was a BRF issue and not considered a reasonable classification!! I would have written as any HCE not an owner is excluded.

QKA, QKC, QPA, CBS

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use