Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest SBlack
Posted

70 1/2 participant has requested full distribution, but has also requested that we not withhold 20%. He claims that his income is not enough to file tax return (even including distribution). Can we do that or is there a possibility that we could be liable for the taxes on that distribution? Is this between the taxpayer and the IRS, or are we required to withhold?

Posted

Paying the tax is between the IRS and the taxpayer. Doing the required withholding is between the IRS and the payor.

Assuming you are talking about a lump sum distribution, yes you have to withhold. But no withholding is required if the employee elects a direct rollover to an IRA.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

The simple solution is to have the participant elect a direct rollover (to avoid the withholding). Because the withholding upon distributions from an IRA are voluntary, the person can get around the withholding rules this way.

Kirk Maldonado

Posted

I agree with Kirk. However, It sounds to me like he needs the money if he's worried about the 20% witholding if he rolls it into an IRA and needs the money he may have early withrawal penalties from taking a distribution.

Guest SBlack
Posted

Thanks - you guys ROCK!

Posted

Because the investment firm to which he rolls it over to could charge him an early withdrawal fee. I don't think that has anything to do with the 70 1/2 rule. It just has to do with investment compnay policy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use