Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The service provider (investment advisor)of the 401(k) plan also happens to be a participant in the plan & a LLC member of the plan's employer. He charges the plan a fee for his investment advisory services. It seems to me like he is "two types of fiduciary" ....1) He selected the trustee and 2) He is a service provider to the plan.

All accounts are participant directed... which probably means that he has little of no liability as a fiduciary in 1) above.

But it is also my understanding that because he is a "party in interest" in 2) above ....plus he receives regular compensation/salary from the employer (as a full time employee/LLC member) .... then, his providing of investment advice to the plan (as a service provider) is a conflict of interest & prohibited under ERISA section 406.

What would the DOL do about this conflict? Could the DOL charge him a $$penalty? Or does his conflict first have to result in a monetary harm to the plan or a participant before he could be penalized? He seems to be doing a good job, no one has complained and he charges only a nominal fee.

Posted

Let's assume that the investment advisor is a disqualified person, and consequently, the investment advisor's compensation constitutes a prohibited transaction (PT). For all transactions occurring after 8/5/97, the Code imposes a 15% penalty tax on a disqualified person for each year or part thereof that the transaction remains uncorrected. Thus (for example), the tax would equal 15% of the 1997 PT compensation for 1997, 15% for 1998, 15% for 1999, 15% for 2000 and 15% for 2001. A similar fact pattern would apply to 1998 PT compensation. Finally, the IRS can impose an additional tax of 100% of the uncorrected PT.

I would observe (without any legal argument) that the issue may turn on who pays the compensation. If the compensation is paid from plan assets, it's almost certain that there is a PT issue. If the employer is paying the advisory fee, there may or may not be a PT. I'd suggest contacting legal counsel for a definitive opinion on the matter.

Jon C. Chambers

Schultz Collins Lawson Chambers, Inc.

Investment Consultants

Posted

Moe, the penalties described above are IRS levies. It is also possible that the DOL could require the advisor to repay the plan all fees paid, plus a 20% civil penalty.

Jon C. Chambers

Schultz Collins Lawson Chambers, Inc.

Investment Consultants

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use