Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Compliance Consultant

Navia Benefit Solutions
(Remote / Fresno CA)

Navia Benefit Solutions logo

Relationship Manager/ Actuary

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Senior Counsel - Benefits and Total Rewards

Tyson Foods
(Springdale AR)

Tyson Foods logo

ERISA Team Leader

July Business Services
(Remote)

July Business Services logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Contributions

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

DC Plan Administrator

Heller Pension Associates, Inc.
(Remote / Hyde Park NY / Miami FL)

Heller Pension Associates, Inc. logo

Senior ERISA Compliance Analyst

Employee Fiduciary, LLC
(Remote)

Employee Fiduciary, LLC logo

Plan Consultant II

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Executive Assistant / Sales Support

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC logo

Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Retirement Plan Installation & Document Manager

Fringe Benefit Group
(Remote / Austin TX)

Fringe Benefit Group logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Publications

LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon
Webinars
and Podcasts
  >  Upcoming   |   On-Demand
Conferences   >  Upcoming   |   Grouped by Location
All Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences   >  Upcoming   |   Grouped by Sponsor

View More Warner Norcross & Judd LLP Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences

Is an FMLA Leave Request a Protected Activity Even If the Employee Doesn’t Qualify for FMLA?

Warner Norcross & Judd LLP

Feb. 13, 2023
On-Demand
Podcast

Steve Palazzolo returns with a new Law Shanty episode inspired by Warner Associate Daniel Brookins’ internal notes to Warner’s Labor and Employment Practice Group, highlighting a recent decision in Milman v. Fieger & Fieger, P.C. This case was initially dismissed by the district court holding that the employee’s retaliation claim could not stand because the underlying leave was not protected. However, upon appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, that decision was overturned, stating that an employee’s request for FMLA leave can constitute protected activity even if the leave request does not ultimately qualify for FMLA protection.

So what are employers to do? Steve sheds light on how employers should adhere to the FMLA’s guidance and how to protect against a retaliation claim.

More Information, How to Register