Featured Jobs
|
Senior ERISA Compliance Analyst Employee Fiduciary, LLC
|
|
Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions LLC
|
|
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services Inc.
|
|
Retirement Plan Distribution Specialist ERISA Services Inc.
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Retirement Compliance Consultant Navia Benefit Solutions
|
|
Retirement Plan Installation & Document Manager Fringe Benefit Group
|
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Heller Pension Associates, Inc.
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
|
Executive Assistant / Sales Support M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Senior 401k Plan Administrator FM International Services
|
|
Recordkeeping and TPA Relationship Manager Daybright Financial
|
Free Publications
|
|
| Webinars and Podcasts |
> | Upcoming | On-Demand |
| Conferences | > | Upcoming | Grouped by Location |
| All Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences | > | Upcoming | Grouped by Sponsor |
SECURE 2.0 Implementation: Insights from a Plan SponsorNAGDCA [National Association of Government Defined Contribution Administrators] |
|
Mar. 17, 2025 On-Demand Webinar |
|
NAGDCA Executive Director Matt Petersen and Kelly Hiers, Defined Contribution Plans Administrator for the Virginia Retirement System, discuss the challenges and decision-making process around implementing both mandatory and optional provisions of SECURE 2.0. Kelly shares insights on plan design, participant needs, and administrative considerations that may help inform your approach. Correction Notice During the webinar, a question was asked about whether all catch-up contributions could be changed to Roth to simplify the salary determination process. In response, Matt Petersen stated that this was possible. However, after further review, we’d like to clarify that the most recent IRS Proposed Regulation indicates that this approach does not meet the intent of the legislation. We apologize for the error and appreciate your understanding. Reference: "The Treasury Department and the IRS have considered [this] suggestion and concluded that ... requiring all participants’ catch-up contributions to be designated Roth would be inconsistent with the language of section 402A(b)(1), which requires that a designated Roth contribution must be elected by an employee in lieu of elective deferrals." |