Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Administrator

Nicholas Pension Consultants
(Remote / Corona CA / Rancho Cordova CA)

Nicholas Pension Consultants logo

Executive Compensation Lawyer

Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation
(Remote / San Francisco CA)

Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation logo

Distribution \ Loan Clerk

Retirement, LLC
(Remote / Oklahoma City OK)

Retirement, LLC logo

Client Service Manager

United 401(k) Plans, Inc.
(Remote)

United 401(k) Plans, Inc. logo

Associate General Counsel

Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
(Washington DC)

Central Pension Fund of the IUOE logo

Retirement Plan Legal Specialist

Pentegra
(Remote / West Harrison NY)

Pentegra logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Carpenter Morse Group
(Remote)

Carpenter Morse Group logo

Enrolled Actuary

Prime Pensions, Inc.
(Remote)

Prime Pensions, Inc. logo

Relationship Manager

Compass Retirement Consulting Group, Inc.
(Remote / NH)

Compass Retirement Consulting Group, Inc. logo

Attorney

Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
(Washington DC)

Central Pension Fund of the IUOE logo

Quality Assurance Manager

Bates & Company
(Remote / Winter Park FL)

Bates & Company logo

Defined Benefit Calculation Specialist/Actuary

The Angell Pension Group, Inc.
(Remote / East Providence RI)

The Angell Pension Group, Inc. logo

Jr Retirement Plan Administrator/ Administrative Assistant

Hochheiser Deutsch & Co, Inc.
(Melville NY)

Hochheiser Deutsch & Co, Inc. logo

Retirement Plan Relationship Manager

ERISA Services, Inc.
(Remote)

ERISA Services, Inc. logo

401(k) Distribution Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon
LIA $FACTS$ for September 1998
View other months

Retirement Plan Design Decisions


  • Decide what the goals of the plan are. While you will always get somewhere without a destination, you may not be happy once you arrive if it does not satisfy your ideas about a proper destination. Japan is a little easier than the States since turnover is still quite low and the retirement plan does not need to be designed as a severance tool. Recruitment is often another consideration. Mature companies seeking no- to low-experience recruits need merely to have a retirement plan to be competitive. Mid- and late-career hires are more difficult, especially with the typical "S" curve of Japanese accruals.


  • Decide who the retirement plan is to serve. It can not serve all groups of employees. The more it is fine-tuned to serve broader groups, the more it will cost and the less management control you will have over it. It will also be more difficult to build off of for special groups of employees who can not be served by the basic design.


  • Decide how much you want to spend. Once the first two decision are made, the overall curve of the plan is pretty much fixed. Your choice here sets the benefit curve either higher or lower. Of course this decision will reflect the current make-up of your employees; future hires will alter the percent of pay relationships because of their ages and pay levels coming in.


  • Decide how you are going to save the money. In Japan all retirement plans are supposed to be funded. Unlike North America, you are permitted to allocate net worth on the balance sheet and get a tax deduction for the accrual in excess of any cash payments made. Tax Qualified Retirement Plans (TQPP) attract an asset tax that can exceed your corporate tax rate. Thanks to some high profile bankruptcies recently, employees are not as keen as they used to be for the apparent security of external funding, but such feelings continue to be a concern, especially among Japanese managers.


Those decisions are pretty much all you need to do. While you should consider the form of the benefit, most Japanese prefer lump sums and, when the plan uses the Book Reserve System, they are the only choice. To increase your understanding of the plan, we would advise you to examine anticipated benefits for several rank and file employees and also for several executives.

A final consideration is to remember that Japan is changing. Make an effort to maintain flexibility. If turnover turns remarkable higher, most Japanese plans will end up costing far more than originally designed. If the investment climate continues to flounder, alternatives need to be considered for saving the money. Investing in your own business remains the most cost-effective method, but it does leave a certain amount of insecurity among some employees.



The Right Book Reserve

One method of saving the money involves externally funding the "normal" or age retirement benefits and carrying a book reserve for the severance benefits. As with all retirement plans following the "Book Reserve System," a tax deduction is permitted for accruals to the book reserve in advance of actual benefit payments being made.

There is a minimal level required for the book reserve. You are permitted to hold higher reserves, but there are restrictions in reducing it later on. The advance tax deduction remains based on the minimal level regardless of how high the reserve is set.

Japan, unlike the U.S. and Canada, distinguishes between voluntary and involuntary severance when determining retirement benefits in the typical plan. The minimal level of book reserve is based on a proportion of the voluntary benefit calculated at the end of the year.

Many companies, in order to reach levels closer to the ABO of FAS 87, hold 100% of the voluntary termination liability. This means, basically, that the company has assets to pay every employee who quits in a situation where every employee does quit. For an ongoing enterprise, this is unlikely to occur.

But of course, in Japan, few employees quit. Involuntary severance is the more common situation. Some companies choose to hold a reserve based on 100% of this amount. This means that they have assets sufficient to fire every employee without suffering insolvency. This amount is usually much larger that the FAS 87 ABO which takes into account the fact that the company is an ongoing concern. In general, holding 100% of the involuntary is extremely conservative and is probably inappropriately shifting earnings among generations of owners and employees.

We recommend trying to track the FAS 87 ABO to the degree permitted by the tax authorities. It is the only number which takes the fact that the company and employment are ongoing into consideration. It, in conjunction with the Net Periodic Pension Cost, reasonably allocates earnings among generations of owners and employees.


Copyright 1998 Lohmann International Associates

You have been reading the online edition of LIA $FACTS$, the monthly fax newsletter of Lohmann International Associates. For further information, please visit our home page on the Web or send e-mail to Les Lohmann.


BenefitsLink Home PageThis page proudly hosted by BenefitsLink
© 2023 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.