TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
Defined Benefit Consultant/Enrolled Actuary Pension Plan Specialists, PC
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Pollard & Associates
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Ninth Circuit Upholds Arm's-Length Standard, Rejects Cost-Sharing of Stock-Based Compensation
Cooley LLP [Guidance Overview] Mar. 31, 2010
Excerpt: In a stunning reversal of its previous opinion in Xilinx, Inc. v. Commissioner, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held on March 22, 2010 that stock option compensation costs need not be shared by participants in a cost sharing arrangement where such costs would not be shared at arm's length between unrelated parties. In its highly controversial prior opinion, the Ninth Circuit had held on May 27, 2009, that Xilinx's stock option compensation was subject to cost sharing, even if such costs would not be shared at arm's length. The Ninth Circuit withdrew that prior opinion on January 10, 2010, and has now reversed its position, affirming that the arm's-length standard is paramount in cost-sharing, as in other areas of transfer pricing.
|
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |