Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Employee Benefits Attorney

Reid & Riege PC
(Hartford CT / Hybrid)

Reid & Riege PC logo

Benefits Analyst

Hydro
(Des Plaines IL / Hybrid)

Hydro logo

Relationship Manager - DC

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

RetirementPlans.com, LLC
(Remote / Addison TX)

RetirementPlans.com, LLC logo

Distribution Reviewer

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Remittance Specialist

Daybright Financial
(Rochester NY / Fort Walton Beach FL / Hybrid)

Daybright Financial logo

CDHP Consultant

BPAS
(Remote / Houston TX / NY / WA / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Participant Services Representative

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Participant Support Representative

Daybright Financial
(Rochester NY / Hybrid)

Daybright Financial logo

Participant Services Representative I - Health & Welfare

BPAS
(Spokane WA / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Senior Distributions Analyst

PCS Retirement
(Remote)

PCS Retirement logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Text of Third Circuit Opinion: Employee-Paid Supplemental Coverage Is Subject to ERISA as Part of Employer-Sponsored Disability Plan (PDF)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Link to more items from this source
Aug. 7, 2014

"All of the characteristics of the Basic Policies and Supplemental Coverage indicate that they are not two separate sources of coverage, but two parts of one broader benefits plan. All of the Basic Policies and Supplemental Coverage were governed by a single group contract between [the employer] and Prudential.... [We] hold that the Supplemental Coverage cannot be unbundled from the Basic Plans. In so holding, we join every Court of Appeals to have considered whether to unbundle closely related components of an employer's broader ERISA benefits plan and declined to do so.... The plaintiffs' claims fall into three broad categories ... In the circumstances presented here, ERISA preempts all three sets of claims." [Menkes v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, No. 13-1408 (3d Cir. Aug. 6, 2014)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).