Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Temporary Document Specialist

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Appeals Courts Now Split on Contraceptive Mandate
SCOTUSblog Link to more items from this source
Sept. 18, 2015

"The Eighth Circuit said that one alternative that the government could use would be to have the entities file a simple notice of their objection to the coverage. Such a notice, the panel ruled, would be 'less onerous' than the alternatives the government has devised, and the entities would not be providing any information about their insurers to aid the government in starting coverage ... Requiring the government to initiate a search to learn which insurer provides coverage for a given entity would not be a significant burden on the government and would not involve the entities in the process." [Dordt College v. Burwell, No. 14-2726 (8th Cir. Sept. 17, 2015); Sharpe Holdings, Inc. v. HHS, No. 14-1507 (8th Cir. Sept. 17, 2015)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).