Featured Jobs
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
BPAS
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Appeals Courts Now Split on Contraceptive Mandate
SCOTUSblog
Sept. 18, 2015 "The Eighth Circuit said that one alternative that the government could use would be to have the entities file a simple notice of their objection to the coverage. Such a notice, the panel ruled, would be 'less onerous' than the alternatives the government has devised, and the entities would not be providing any information about their insurers to aid the government in starting coverage ... Requiring the government to initiate a search to learn which insurer provides coverage for a given entity would not be a significant burden on the government and would not involve the entities in the process." [Dordt College v. Burwell, No. 14-2726 (8th Cir. Sept. 17, 2015); Sharpe Holdings, Inc. v. HHS, No. 14-1507 (8th Cir. Sept. 17, 2015)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |