Featured Jobs
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Tenth Circuit Makes Clear That Arms-Length Service Agreements Without Evidence of a Prior Relationship Are Not Prohibited Transactions
Jackson Lewis P.C. 
June 22, 2021 "Plaintiffs contended, '[b]ecause [the recordkeeper] is a service provider and hence a 'party in interest,' its 'furnishing of' recordkeeping and administrative services to the Plan constituted a prohibited transaction[.]' The Tenth Circuit soundly rejected that notion, noting '[t]he class's interpretation leads to an absurd result: the initial agreement with a service provider would simultaneously transform that provider into a party in interest and make that same transaction prohibited under Section 1106.' " [Ramos v. Banner Health, No. 20-1231 (10th Cir. June 11, 2021)] |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |