Featured Jobs
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
BPAS
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Final Thoughts Before the Hughes v. Northwestern Supreme Court Oral Argument
Encore Fiduciary
[Opinion] Dec. 6, 2021 "As we head into oral argument, [the authors'] advice has not changed. The goal for plan sponsors is to win the war, not just this individual battle, on excessive fee lawsuits. We need a more rigorous pleadings standard to divide 'the plausible sheep from the meritless goats,' regardless of the final outcome in the Northwestern case." [Hughes v. Northwestern Univ., No. 18-2569 (7th Cir. Mar. 25, 2020; cert. pet. granted No. 19-1401, Jul. 2, 2020)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |