TPApril Posted September 30, 2021 Posted September 30, 2021 Plan wants to start 1/1 of the next year (1/1/22) for both 401k and PS. With the plan being adopted prior to 1/1, is there a reason the plan cannot make the PS effective the prior year (1/1/21) even though there is currently no intent to make such a contribution. What if they have an existing SEP in current year and made the plan effective 1/1/21, would there still be an issue with no contributions for the plan year to the PS?
Mike Preston Posted September 30, 2021 Posted September 30, 2021 What is the reason that they want to make it effective 1/1/2021? Just so they can potentially decide to make a contribution for 2021 at a later date? If so, then I think it works. If it is for some other reason, maybe yes, maybe no. Bill Presson 1
TPApril Posted September 30, 2021 Author Posted September 30, 2021 Reason is for potential grandfathering of plans adopted prior to 1/1/22 in proposed bill in Washington.
Mike Preston Posted September 30, 2021 Posted September 30, 2021 What advantage do you see to the grandfathering?
TPApril Posted October 1, 2021 Author Posted October 1, 2021 No need to add auto enrollment. Bill Presson 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now