401kCotttage Posted October 22, 2021 Posted October 22, 2021 Hello, I work for company A who has acquired several businesses through stock purchase, in different states, same business type and will continue to acquire more over the next few years. Each acquisition is maintaining their own EIN. We own 80% to 100% of each acquisition and we consider them part of our control group which allows them to participate in our health and welfare plans. I have been asked for financial reasons to create multiple options for benefit offerings that may have differences in PTO days, 401k, health plans and other items for each acquisitions employees - none of the acquisitions has less than 60 employees. Example: Plan 1 would have full health plan offering, 22 PTO Days, SH 401K w% Match Plan 2 would offer full health plan offering, 19 PTO days, 401K no match Plan 3 would offer HMO health plan options only, 18 PTO Days, 401k no match. My dilemma is around the 401k options - Company A (The acquirer) has a single employer SH 401K plan. Because we consider these acquisitions a part of our control group I do not believe we can shift our SH 401k plan to a multiple employer plan because we are related businesses. Company A has a safe harbor plan with employer match and company A does not want to offer 401k employer match in all regions for financial reasons and because the acquisitions either have no 401k and if they do have a 401k they do not match If you have suggestions for how I might design 401k options to fit this scenario I would be grateful for the ideas.
401kCotttage Posted October 26, 2021 Author Posted October 26, 2021 I know this is complex, and if I can simplify I am happy to - appreciate any input.
Luke Bailey Posted October 26, 2021 Posted October 26, 2021 401(k)Cottage, generally a controlled group can have more than one 401(k), with different contribution levels. They will just need to be considered as plans of a single employer for various nondiscrimination and top-heavy requirements. There's really not much more to say at this level of generality. Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted October 26, 2021 Posted October 26, 2021 And coverage testing becomes an important concern. You might be able to use the qualified separate lines of business rules to help with that.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now