VeryOldMan Posted January 12, 2022 Posted January 12, 2022 Our firm has been using Corbel docs for years. FIS took over a few years ago. In doing the amendment process from PPA plan documents to Cycle 3 plan amendments, FIS has a cool way of converting the checklists so you can quickly restate plans for cycle 3 without having to go back and enter each checklist question. We use the IDP form of plan document, so we're going from a IDP PPA plan doc to the IDP Cycle 3 amendment. After running several plans through the process, we found numerous syntax errors in their cycle 3 document. I discussed this with FIS back in November but they have yet to correct the problem. Is anyone else using FIS documents for the IDP format ( one single plan document) and are you having a similar problem? If so I would like to know your experience with FIS and what I can do to resolve this. I suppose I could switch to a non-IDP document format but that would not be our first choice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now