BG5150 Posted March 18, 2022 Posted March 18, 2022 A few years ago, sponsor amended plan to exclude by name two partners (there are several other partners in the plan). Now they want to remove that exclusion. Are there any discrimination issues given the fact that the amendment only affects HCEs? I wouldn't think so because the HCEs aren't getting special treatment per se. They've otherwise satisfied the age/service conditions. It's not like they are being let in early. I just want to make sure I'm not overlooking anything. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Bri Posted March 18, 2022 Posted March 18, 2022 I think you're fine - "It's not discriminatory to stop discriminating." ESOPMomma 1
CuseFan Posted March 18, 2022 Posted March 18, 2022 Is this a DC or DB/CB plan? If DB, be careful this is not (or doesn't start) a pattern of amendments of such nature and frequency that in practice creates what IRS might challenge as a discretionary plan and/or potential non-compliant CODA. Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services kprell@bpas.com
BG5150 Posted March 18, 2022 Author Posted March 18, 2022 DC plan. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now