Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The owner would like us to take the Cycle 3 restatement fee from the plan. The plan document allows us to take this type of fee from the plan. However she (the owner) has indicated that she wants the whole fee to come out of her account only and not across the board from the participants accounts. Is this permissible, can we take the fee from her account only? The document doesn't address this unfortunately.

Posted

Agree this should be OK. I mean owner (company) could pay directly outside the plan so why not incur the entire cost to herself inside the plan? I can't see a DOL auditor insisting that the owner has to spread the fee to NHCEs as well, but one never does know what rigid irrational rule applications lurk in the minds of labor laborers!

Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA

Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services

kprell@bpas.com

Posted

RaiCMC just out of curiosity, from a tax perspective, and future retirement income, why would the owner want to reduce his/her account without an tax benefit, as opposed to writing a business check and taking a reasonable business expense tax deduction?

Posted
9 minutes ago, ErnieG said:

RaiCMC just out of curiosity, from a tax perspective, and future retirement income, why would the owner want to reduce his/her account without an tax benefit, as opposed to writing a business check and taking a reasonable business expense tax deduction?

Maybe he has little or no taxable income this year would rather pay the expense out of an account that will one day be subject to taxation.

Posted

What provision in the plan allows him to do that?  Do any of the underlying documents say the plan administrator can pick and choose the accounts the fees come from?

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

that said, i looked through our BPD and I only see that the administration fees can be paid against the trust.  Nothing about specific apportionment that I can see.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

I think the fact that it is non-discriminatory is too little reason to say this is fine.

You have to follow the plan's provisions.   I doubt there is a plan provision that says fees can be taken from any given participant's account only.   If a case can be made saying it can be done based on a plan provision fine but in all the decades I have read plan documents I have never seen a  plan's allocation provision that says this can be done. 

This is plan admin 101 here.   It has to be both legal AND in the plan document not just merely legal for a plan to do it.  

Posted

Is there even a nondiscrimination test for fees?

1 hour ago, ESOP Guy said:

It has to be both legal AND in the plan document not just merely legal for a plan to do it.  

I believe too many people think, "oh, it's only negatively affecting the owner or HCE's, so the DOL will be ok with it."

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use