Tom Posted December 12, 2022 Posted December 12, 2022 We have a client who opened a new plan in August 2022. The plan effective date is 1/1/2022. Deferrals did not begin until Oct 1, 2022. It is a basic safe harbor match plan allocated on a plan year basis. The match will be calculated after the end of the year. My question is must the match be based on compensation only from Oct 1 through Dec 31 or the entire year? Example: Employee has $10,000 in wages each of 4 quarters. Oct - Dec defers $2,000. Would this person get a $400 Match (4% just on 4th qtr wages), or a $1600 match (4% on full year wages)? Nothing in the plan limits the compensation or match period. Appreciate your comments.
Lou S. Posted December 12, 2022 Posted December 12, 2022 36 minutes ago, Tom said: Nothing in the plan limits the compensation or match period. If that's what your document says, I would think annual compensation would control for calculating the match. Luke Bailey 1
Tom Posted December 13, 2022 Author Posted December 13, 2022 Thanks Lou. I questioned because the effect is generally to favor HCEs - they can easily defer $20,500 in last qtr of the year and get 4% match on pay for the full year. A NHCE could defer 20% in last qtr (5% avg for the year) and get 4% match on pay for the full year. That would be unusual for an NHCE to defer a high% in last quarter but it is possible.
Luke Bailey Posted December 20, 2022 Posted December 20, 2022 On 12/12/2022 at 2:05 PM, Tom said: Deferrals did not begin until Oct 1, 2022. Why didn't they? If the plan was properly communicated and the administrative apparatus in place 1/1/2022 to accept deferrals, and safe harbor notice provided before or around 1/1 when the plan was adopted, but no one chose to defer until 10/1, OK. But if the deferral feature was not effectively implemented until 10/1/2022, so that NHCEs really had no practical way to defer before that date, I think IRS might argue plan was really not effective until 10/1. The rule that a plan can generally be adopted with a retroactive effective date, would seem to conflict with the "plan year requirement" of Treas. reg. sec. 1.401(k)-3(e) in this case. Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now