Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So - I know that ultimately the Plan Sponsor is responsible for all plan compliance, and this is clearly stated in any service agreement with a TPA.

In this case, prior TPA did not seem to communicate effectively that a new plan set up a few years back had a 5500 requirement. In fact, they are a large plan with an audit requirement attached to the 5500.

There are more circumstances related to lack of consulting services, such as creating a Plan Doc that wasn't really a fit for the organization. As a result there are major, and costly corrections that need to be made.

I think there is no recourse, due to my first statement above, but just wondering about any other similar experiences. The Plan Sponsor wants to press the prior TPA for costs incurred due to negligent servicing.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, TPApril said:

I think there is no recourse, due to my first statement above, but just wondering about any other similar experiences. The Plan Sponsor wants to press the prior TPA for costs incurred due to negligent servicing.

Very few contracts are bulletproof, but is it worth the cost and headache to maybe be able to shift some of the burden to the prior service provider?  I agree with Lou, refer them to outside legal counsel.  Also, consider that there are probably three sides to the story: the client's side, the TPA's side, and the truth.

 

 

Posted

Not a lawyer but all TPAs have E&O insurance for a reason.  We are required to act in a professional manner and can't be negligent and just say, "well the PA has the only legal responsibility". 

 

But as noted this is for a lawyer to opine on if it is worth the legal fight.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use