truphao Posted May 24, 2024 Posted May 24, 2024 S corp, State of CT, H&W, Husband is 100% Owner of the business, both H and W are receiving W-2. The client wishes to decrease the benefit formula for 2024 (<1,000 hrs as of now). Is 204(h) Notice required? I do not believe so, am I wrong?
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted May 24, 2024 Posted May 24, 2024 A non-ERISA plan is not required to give an ERISA 204(h) notice. The plan only covers the 100% shareholder and their spouse, and no one else is eligible, so the plan is not subject to the notice requirement. Luke Bailey and Bill Presson 2
truphao Posted May 24, 2024 Author Posted May 24, 2024 John F, thank you for confirming, this is my logic as well but I wanted to make sure I am not overlooking anything impofrtant.
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted May 24, 2024 Posted May 24, 2024 10 minutes ago, truphao said: John F, thank you for confirming, this is my logic as well but I wanted to make sure I am not overlooking anything impofrtant. You definitely did not overlook anything impofrtant. Luke Bailey 1
truphao Posted May 24, 2024 Author Posted May 24, 2024 here is a follow up question. If it were an ERISA plan but only the Owners' benefits are being reduced (no NHCEs are impacted), would the 204(h) Notice be required issued to the Owners only?
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted May 24, 2024 Posted May 24, 2024 Yes. ERISA requires the advance notice regardless of who is being reduced because the plan subject to ERISA. Luke Bailey 1
truphao Posted May 24, 2024 Author Posted May 24, 2024 Thank you again, and I am in agreement again. Was double-checking my understanding.
CuseFan Posted May 28, 2024 Posted May 28, 2024 BUT, the notice would only go to those experiencing the reduction, i.e., the owners, and not any other participant whose benefit is unaffected. Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services kprell@bpas.com
Peter Gulia Posted May 28, 2024 Posted May 28, 2024 ERISA § 204(h)(8)(A) defines an “applicable individual” as a participant or alternate payee “whose rate of future benefit accrual under the plan may reasonably be expected to be significantly reduced by such plan amendment.” https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:29%20section:1054%20edition:prelim)%20OR%20(granuleid:USC-prelim-title29-section1054)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=true Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now