Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The 401k Plan Sponsor wants to change when participants can make deferral changes from monthly to annually.  The plan document allows for it.  Are there any consequences if they make that change?

Posted

Pissed off employees?

If the proposed change is to save some admin fees, the ER should be honest and transparent about it.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

I'm sure that will not go over well with the employees and I don't know why he wants such a drastic change.  But would this impact 404(c) compliance if they can only change deferral percentages annually?

Posted

I do not recollect a restriction on the timing of deferrals.  I will note that often times reducing the number of time deferral elections can be made ends up be a bigger administrative burden because all the changes are going to come at once.  Also, if the employer does change the timeframe for making deferral elections from monthly to annually, you might want to suggest that the employer keep the monthly election if a participant wants to go to a 0% election.

Just my thoughts so DO NOT take my ramblings as advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use