Santo Gold Posted January 28 Posted January 28 The 401k Plan Sponsor wants to change when participants can make deferral changes from monthly to annually. The plan document allows for it. Are there any consequences if they make that change?
david rigby Posted January 28 Posted January 28 Pissed off employees? If the proposed change is to save some admin fees, the ER should be honest and transparent about it. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Santo Gold Posted January 28 Author Posted January 28 I'm sure that will not go over well with the employees and I don't know why he wants such a drastic change. But would this impact 404(c) compliance if they can only change deferral percentages annually?
Bri Posted January 28 Posted January 28 404(c) means they have to be able to transfer investments at least quarterly, but the deferral rate isn't tied to that. Bill Presson 1
Artie M Posted January 29 Posted January 29 I do not recollect a restriction on the timing of deferrals. I will note that often times reducing the number of time deferral elections can be made ends up be a bigger administrative burden because all the changes are going to come at once. Also, if the employer does change the timeframe for making deferral elections from monthly to annually, you might want to suggest that the employer keep the monthly election if a participant wants to go to a 0% election. Just my thoughts so DO NOT take my ramblings as advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now