Jakyasar Posted March 15 Posted March 15 Hi Here is a new one for me. Client just informed me that the RK (no name) returned the 2023 PS contribution to him in January (he just informed me a few days ago). He sent them the check back in September. As this is a combo plan, there are 2 issues: Deduction was taken for 2023 but deposit was not made Gateway/top heavy is not satisfied Anyone came across a situation like this and what is the correction? Thanks
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted March 16 Posted March 16 Check bounced? Insufficient funds? Or was it deposited, but perhaps with no allocation instructions, and after getting no response for how to allocate/invest, they sent a check for the trustee to transfer to another trust account for the plan to be held somewhere outside of the R/K platform? Some other reason? The reason it was returned may help for guiding them. Bill Presson 1
Jakyasar Posted March 16 Author Posted March 16 It is neither, they confirmed receipt of the wire transfer in but never allocated to the 3 participants, did not inform the plan sponsor of any issues/delays and simply returned the monies in January.
Bill Presson Posted March 16 Posted March 16 2 hours ago, Jakyasar said: It is neither, they confirmed receipt of the wire transfer in but never allocated to the 3 participants, did not inform the plan sponsor of any issues/delays and simply returned the monies in January. So it was a wire and not a check? This is odd and, while I believe you are saying what you have been told, I don’t believe “did not inform the plan sponsor of any issues/delays” at all. The sponsor is not being upfront OR their spam filter is too tight. John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA 1 William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA bill.presson@gmail.com C 205.994.4070
david rigby Posted March 16 Posted March 16 2 hours ago, Jakyasar said: It is neither, they confirmed receipt of the wire transfer in but never allocated to the 3 participants, did not inform the plan sponsor of any issues/delays and simply returned the monies in January. This response does not answer the question: Why? Bill Presson 1 I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Jakyasar Posted March 17 Author Posted March 17 I am waiting to hear from the RK on the "why". Trying to get to the bottom of all this and still searching for answers. Bill Presson 1
Kirk Vaughn Posted March 18 Posted March 18 Sounds like the record keeper might need to draft a reasonable cause letter to help the employer avoid some nasty consequences.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now