Featured Jobs
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Regional Sales Director-Heartland July Business Services
|
|
Relationship Manager – Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
|
Director of Regulatory Operations and Compliance PCS Retirement
|
|
Experienced Employee Benefits Attorney Shipman & Goodwin LLP
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Regional Sales Director-Mid Atlantic July Business Services
|
|
Internal Channel Sales Team Lead July Business Services
|
|
Stones River Consulting
|
|
Spectrum Pension Consultants (part of Daybright Financial)
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Independent Retirement
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Director, Strategic Accounts and Channel Development July Business Services
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
| Webinars and Podcasts |
> | Upcoming | On-Demand |
| Conferences | > | Upcoming | Grouped by Location |
| All Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences | > | Upcoming | Grouped by Sponsor |
View More American Retirement Association [ARA] Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences
Nevin & Fred Ponder Pension Risk Transfers and Data ProtocolsAmerican Retirement Association [ARA] |
|
Mar. 24, 2025 On-Demand Podcast |
|
As interest rates rise, so has interest in pension risk transfers (PRTs) — and litigation. Nevin & Fred take a look at what’s underlying (and undermining) that focus, as well as a new suit alleging aggressive participant marketing. Pension risk transfer is an aptly named process undertaken by an organization that wants to transfer its pension obligations to another entity, typically an insurance company. The process itself is a fiduciary decision requiring careful consideration of the entity to which those obligations are transferred — and therein lies the basis of a recent spate of litigation regarding those choices (and during a period of time in which PRT volumes have been setting records). For those not familiar with the underpinnings of the pension risk transfer (PRT — because we need another acronym), Interpretive Bulletin (IB) 95-1, issued by the Department of Labor in 1995 (in the wake of the Executive Life collapse), outlines the fiduciary standards to be used in selecting an annuity provider for a pension risk transfer. That includes considerations of the provider’s investment portfolio, size relative to the annuity contract, level of capital and surplus, liability exposure and availability of state government guaranty associations. In 2024, and in accordance with the provisions of the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022, the Labor Department basically concluded that while it was open to, and still considering, potential updates to IB 95-1, it felt that that document “continues to identify broad factors that are relevant to a fiduciary’s prudent and loyal evaluation of an annuity provider’s claims-paying ability and creditworthiness.” Additionally, EBSA found it “desirable for guidance in this area to remain principles-based.” In this episode, Nevin (Adams) and Fred (Reish) talk about the trends and issues here. They also look at a new lawsuit that brings up an old issue — a recordkeeper’s access to participants and alleged promotion of their offerings. |