Vlad401k Posted Thursday at 08:21 PM Posted Thursday at 08:21 PM We have a plan with 2 participants (correction: employees) 100% Owner and another employee who is an HCE (but not a Key Employee). The plan excludes the HCE by name and only the Owner contributes to the plan. The Plan is Top Heavy. The plan passes coverage testing, since there are no NHCEs. Does the plan have to fund the Top Heavy Minimum 3% to the HCE who is excluded from the Plan? Thanks!
Bri Posted Thursday at 09:39 PM Posted Thursday at 09:39 PM You say he's a participant, but you also say he's excluded from the plan by name. Why is he being deemed a participant? Because if he's really NOT one, then the THM would not apply. That's different from being eligible and just not accruing anything. Bill Presson 1
Bri Posted Friday at 03:30 PM Posted Friday at 03:30 PM oh, upon seeing the correction that HCE 2 is specifically not a participant, then that makes it evident he wouldn't need to get a THM.
Jakyasar Posted Friday at 09:36 PM Posted Friday at 09:36 PM I thought exclusion by name was a BRF issue and not considered a reasonable classification!! I would have written as any HCE not an owner is excluded. QKA, QKC, QPA, CBS
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted yesterday at 05:19 AM Posted yesterday at 05:19 AM Jakyasar, a reasonable classification is only necessary for passing coverage when the 70% ratio test for coverage is not satisfied. If there are only two employees and both are HCEs, then coverage is deemed to pass, so the exclusion can be done by name without creating any issues.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now