Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Filed a very basic VCP on a SIMPLE-IRA plan in June. Received an acknowledgement letter in mid-AUGUST. Called twice recently to check status. In spite of the IRS voice mail promising a call-back within 2-3 business days, it took 7 business days, but at least they did call. I didn't speak to the person - they left me a voice mail, but it has NOT YET BEEN ASSIGNED TO A REVIEWER. It will be "at least several weeks" before it is even assigned.

Just an fyi to prepare yourself to hurry up and wait...

Posted

I've got one pending since 12/15 - 2016!

Posted

I've heard practitioners express differing views about whether it matters how quickly or slowly the Service acts on VCP submissions.

Some say a client might perceive a long lag as somehow suggesting the practitioner's lack of care or diligence.

Others say a wait is fine because a taxpayer is protected once it has filed the submission.  And some say a lag might even help because a practitioner might "supplement" a submission to include further errors.

What do BenefitsLink mavens think?

 

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

Posted

FGC:  I think people tend to overthink hings like how long the VCP filing takes.  Yes, you can "supplement" with other errors/issues - but we do a complete (as complete as possible) audit to uncover other issues that should be included.  The "one" rule we hold virtually inviolate is to "not poke the bear" once the filing has been made.  Our experience has been that when awoken, the "bear" is in a bad mood and that hasn't bode well for the outcome.

The IRS has been made to "starve" for ideological reasons.  Those that remain tend to be believe they are overworked (and underpaid), and when left alone, when their internal "metrics" indicate they are falling behind, a lot happens in a short time and we get the compliance letter sought.

I hate to say that, but that has been our experience....

Posted

I don't think you can give an answer that fits all situations. I'd say that generally, however, clients want closure/certainty, which doesn't exist while the application is pending, so they can get frustrated. However, they certainly don't blame me because the IRS hasn't yet even assigned it to a reviewer.

 

Posted
44 minutes ago, Fiduciary Guidance Counsel said:

Others say a wait is fine because a taxpayer is protected once it has filed the submission. 

This is what I say.  I filed a VCP Submission back during the summer for a non-amender.  Filed another one back in October.  I received the Compliance Statement for the one I filed in October.  The one I filed during the summer is still pending.  

You can only imagine the chaos that goes on behind those doors.  Ultimately, it goes to accountability; who's making who do their work? 

I've had submissions that lasted for a couple of years; even the simple ones (not to be confused with SIMPLE IRA, but merely a streamlined submission).  Once filed, you're immune to the failures included withing that submission.

Good Luck!

CPC, QPA, QKA, TGPC, ERPA

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I filed one in early April 2017, a one-participant-plan non-amender. Should be a rubber-stamp. I just heard from them again that it hasn't yet been assigned to an agent.

Andrew, ERPA, CPC, QPA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use