AlbanyConsultant Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 I've got a lawyer (naturally) who wants to establish a trust for the sole benefit of his wife as his plan beneficiary. He's wondering if this requires her consent, since she is technically not directly the beneficiary... but she kind of is ("kind of" isn't his term, of course). No, I don't know why he's going through all this, or if he's trying on purpose to not have her sign something - I'm trying to get those details. Any initial thoughts? Thanks.
Bird Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 Assuming it is a plan that requires a spousal beneficiary for 100% of the benefits, then it is pretty clear. She's a spouse and has to be the beneficiary, unless she waives. I don't care if the trust is irrevocable and says she can do whatever she wants - she's still not the beneficiary. Ed Snyder
Larry Starr Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 5 hours ago, AlbanyConsultant said: I've got a lawyer (naturally) who wants to establish a trust for the sole benefit of his wife as his plan beneficiary. He's wondering if this requires her consent, since she is technically not directly the beneficiary... but she kind of is ("kind of" isn't his term, of course). No, I don't know why he's going through all this, or if he's trying on purpose to not have her sign something - I'm trying to get those details. Any initial thoughts? Thanks. And even if it doesn't require 100% to the spouse (that is, it provides a J&S as the automatic), the spouse is still the beneficiary for at least 1/2 and her consent will be needed. Lawrence C. Starr, FLMI, CLU, CEBS, CPC, ChFC, EA, ATA, QPFC President Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc. 46 Daggett Drive West Springfield, MA 01089 413-736-2066 larrystarr@qpc-inc.com
AlbanyConsultant Posted December 11, 2018 Author Posted December 11, 2018 The plan doesn't have QJ&S, but I suggested that he get the spouse to sign off because he was putting someone (the executor) between the account and his spouse, and if he wasn't trying to scheme his way out of something, he should have no problem doing that. Haven't heard anything since then.
Larry Starr Posted December 11, 2018 Posted December 11, 2018 3 hours ago, AlbanyConsultant said: The plan doesn't have QJ&S, but I suggested that he get the spouse to sign off because he was putting someone (the executor) between the account and his spouse, and if he wasn't trying to scheme his way out of something, he should have no problem doing that. Haven't heard anything since then. Not suggested: mandatory! In a non J&S plan the spouse HAS TO BE the beneficiary for 100% of the account (which is why we don't do non J&S; it disinherits the children of a prior marriage). In order for the spouse NOT to be the bene, the spouse MUST waive spousal rights. If the spouse does not sign off, then the spouse is legally the beneficiary under ERISA and no other document can change that. Lawrence C. Starr, FLMI, CLU, CEBS, CPC, ChFC, EA, ATA, QPFC President Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc. 46 Daggett Drive West Springfield, MA 01089 413-736-2066 larrystarr@qpc-inc.com
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now