msmith Posted December 21, 2018 Posted December 21, 2018 A 401(k) Plan permits rollovers for participants only. A recordkeeper permitted an employee to roll over funds before he met the Plan's eligibility requirements. They did not check with TPA. We found out about the rollover because the employee tried to obtain a loan from the Plan - which was denied. When we requested that the Recordkeeper disgorge the funds, they never acted on the request. Because the Plan has a 3 month waiting period, the employee is now eligible. If the funds stay in the Plan (with Trustee direction), should we do an Amendment to permit this employee early participation for rollover purposes? If not, what are the ramifications. This is an audited Plan.
Larry Starr Posted December 21, 2018 Posted December 21, 2018 Well, if the auditors catch it and comment, they will most likely say "don't do that again". Doing the single amendment can't hurt, but maybe you just wait until you see if the auditors put up a fuss and make you do it. Lawrence C. Starr, FLMI, CLU, CEBS, CPC, ChFC, EA, ATA, QPFC President Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc. 46 Daggett Drive West Springfield, MA 01089 413-736-2066 larrystarr@qpc-inc.com
Lou S. Posted December 21, 2018 Posted December 21, 2018 I think you can self correct this with a retro active amendment. JackS 1
Luke Bailey Posted December 27, 2018 Posted December 27, 2018 Do you even need an amendment? The self-correction would be to distribute, then he could roll back once eligible. But he already is a participant, so has a deemed rollback. Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now